Combining insurance isn’t always cheapest option

More than two-fifths of households would save money by buying home and buildings insurance separately, rather than combined, according to research by AA Insurance.

The study compared nearly 25,000 home insurance quotes for 750 homeowners throughout the UK and found that 41% could pay less overall if they took out their buildings and contents policies from different insurers. When temporary promotional discounts were removed from the equation, this figure rose to 59%.

Simon Douglas, director of AA Insurance said:

“Many insurers offer special discounts for buying a combined home and contents policy. But even when taking that into account, a surprising number of customers would be better off buying the policies from different insurers although using a broker enables the most cost-effective combination to be bought from a single source.”

“This underlines the fact that even if you get a great price on buildings, the same insurer won’t necessarily offer the best deal for contents (or vice versa). However, it is important that buyers don’t just check prices but policy benefits too, to ensure they are comparing on a like for like basis.”

“Our study also shows that they would probably get a better deal if they bought their cover elsewhere. But the important thing is that they don’t just allow their cover to lapse – recent suggestions that the recession has led up to a fifth of householders to cancel or not renew their cover is worrying, especially at a time when claims for both burglary and weather damage are increasing.”